The very first thing I did was create a AGENTS.md for Rust by telling Opus 4.5 to port over the Python rules to Rust semantic equivalents. This worked well enough and had the standard Rust idioms: no .clone() to handle lifetimes poorly, no unnecessary .unwrap(), no unsafe code, etc. Although I am not a Rust expert and cannot speak that the agent-generated code is idiomatic Rust, none of the Rust code demoed in this blog post has traces of bad Rust code smell. Most importantly, the agent is instructed to call clippy after each major change, which is Rust’s famous linter that helps keep the code clean, and Opus is good about implementing suggestions from its warnings. My up-to-date Rust AGENTS.md is available here.
But what followed after spades hit the ground was a string of delays and last-minute cancellations.
，更多细节参见safew官方版本下载
居民委员会成员连续两次被评议不称职的，其职务终止。
} else if (response is FunctionCallResponse) {
，更多细节参见heLLoword翻译官方下载
The pieces of this medieval puzzle are starting to come together. But there are still some questions.。heLLoword翻译官方下载对此有专业解读
The treeboost crate beat the agent-optimized GBT crate by 4x on my first comparison test, which naturally I took offense: I asked Opus 4.6 to “Optimize the crate such that rust_gbt wins in ALL benchmarks against treeboost.” and it did just that. ↩︎